9/13/2023 0 Comments Idaho gray wolfDownes heard legal argument in Cheyenne, Wyoming and, on January 3, 1995, issued an order denying a motion to preliminarily enjoin the reintroduction efforts.ġ995. On Novem- two days after the final nonessential experimental population rules were published - several groups filed suit in Federal District Court in Wyoming and sought to halt any reintroduction of wolves by the Service. Some opponents and proponents of wolf reintroduction immediately attempted to prevent implementation of the reintroduction plan. Releases were planned to begin early in the fall so that wolves would settle before the mid-February breeding season.Scientific opinion, access to release areas, and other logistical challenges led the Service to plan a: hard release (wolves captured, transported, and immediately released with a minimum of holding, handling, and expense) of young adult wolves in Idaho and a soft release (wolves acclimated in pens for weeks or months before release) of family groups in YNP.The Canadian source areas were situated along the Rocky Mountains and had similar terrain and prey to the YNP and central Idaho release locations. Officials in Alberta and British Columbia offered wolves for reintroduction. A reintroduction plan was developed in the summer and fall of 1994.Babbitt in 1994, provided for wolf restoration while allowing management flexibility to deal with concerns of the local public. This approach, approved by Secretary of the Interior Bruce E. In it, the Service proposed that wolves be reintroduced into both YNP and central Idaho and designated as "nonessential experimental populations" pursuant to Section 10(j) of the ESA, 16 U.S.C. During the preparation of the EIS, over 130 public meetings were held and some 170,000 comments were received from the public. Forest Service to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on wolf reintroduction into YNP and Idaho. In late 1991, Congress directed the Service to work with the National Park Service and the U.S. Achievement of this goal would be followed by removal of the gray wolf from ESA protection in the NRM region of the United States. The recovery goal was ten breeding pairs of wolves in each of the three recovery areas (northwestern Montana (NWMT), central Idaho (CID), and the Greater Yellowstone Area (GYA)) for three successive years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |